A further update: I have a newer, more recent post, which is a reflection on the immediate aftermath and reactions from the publishing of this letter. I would gratefully appreciate anyone who takes the time to lay their eyes upon both.
Update: On a wise suggestion, and without taking down what I feel has no reason to come down, I have made anonymous to the public the subjects of this letter. But I stand behind every word.
I wrote and made public this letter in the days leading up to Friday, 27th May 2011. I have received many congratulations for it, which I expected, and some requests and suggestions that I remove it, which were also expected. Some of the reasoning I have heard in favor of taking it down are very valid – things that occurred to me, but that I chose to minimize, because, honestly, I didn’t think it would be as sensational or significant as it apparently is. The bigger this gets, the more valid these arguments become, and I may choose to take this down – or I may not. After all, I ask, is this truly a world where my words are more damaging than the actions they describe? It was written in response to real things happening. There is some outrage over what I’ve written. Is there outrage over the actions my words are describing? If my words are true at all, I sincerely hope there is. Whether you who are reading this know [Mr.X] or not, if you wish, I welcome you to weigh in on this option, privately or publicly. As yet, I am undecided. Thanks.
An open letter to [Mr. X],
[The Company], [City], [State].
From Sherwin Young, until recently, under your employment.
It’s important to me that you know why I quit.
[The Company] advertises on its website, and elsewhere, that its “mission of providing both guests and employees a place to renew their spirit has never wavered.” I think it is generally true that the customers get that. Do your employees?
Your behavior, in almost every way I have witnessed throughout these past 3+ years I have worked at The Company, has been irresponsible, selfish, unprofessional and disrespectful. I think you are self-aware enough to know what I’m talking about.
In general, you have a history of substance abuse, whether with marijuana or alcohol (or both, or… who knows?) that has, to varying degrees, influenced your behavior on the job. The number of times you retreat from your duties as manager to go to the bar next-door, for a shot and to check a game’s score, is countless. An easy defense would be for you to say that I’ve never specifically witnessed these actions, and that’s true. But, [X], your employees can tell when you’re drunk and when you’re high; you’re not fooling anyone. It is not the act of what you are doing that I find unacceptable, but rather the effect it has on your behavior and performance in the restaurant. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
You play favorites, but, more importantly, you play what I will call “Not Favorites.” By this, I mean there are some employees who arbitrarily suffer your unjust abuse and temper tantrums. I’ve seen you get in fights with or verbally abuse various employees, often during business hours, in front of customers. I have experienced this firsthand, and I’ve witnessed your similar, more severe, interactions with others. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
The amount you reward your hard-working employees is virtually nonexistent. When corporate decision-makers clamped down on your labor budget a couple of years ago, your first solution was to take tips away from the [kitchenpositionA] and [kitchenpositionB], and reduce the [kitchenpositionC] to a $7.50/hr tip position. You offered initial lip service about being able to afford higher wages for those who deserved it, but it never showed up in anyone’s paycheck. Except maybe yours, [the asst. front end manager]’s and [the kitchen manager]’s. I guess we were expecting something for us.
Further, I’ve spoken with many of my coworkers, and not once have I heard a happy success story about asking you for a deserved raise. I’ll use myself as an easy recent example: With many experienced employees dropping like flies around you, I was obviously becoming one of the few senior experienced kitchen workers left. I asked you for a modest raise. Your response was that you’d have to ask [the kitchen manager] what he thought. We both know you don’t need [the kitchen manager]’s approval for this. You know how hard your most experienced, hardest workers work. You work with them on weekend nights; you see them in peak performance week after week..
I never saw that last raise. I could have kept on you – bugging you – asking over and over for weeks, if not months, before finally getting the raise I deserved, long after I asked for it. In my experience, this is what your employees have to do; I have no reason to believe that you have ever volunteered to give anyone a raise for being a good, hard worker. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
I know, from talking with several waitresses, that, in the past, you have lacked basic professionalism at company parties (especially as a married, presumably monogamous, individual). This causes your staff to be uncomfortable when interacting with you, and this lacking only worsens as your level of inebriation rises. This is, of course, not to mention what I have heard about you on the rumor mill recently, and have chosen not to indulge further here. But it’s not the reason for why I quit.
You are paranoid that certain people are taking advantage of you, I am one of them. I can recall many specific examples of you accusing, or “asking” me if I was taking a second Staff [meal] for the week, or if I’d already had my one (or two) drink(s) for my shift(s) of the day. Let me tell you again, as I did in each of those examples: No, I never took advantage of you. I’ve worked at [The Company] long enough that I can remember the “limitless” shift drinks policy of several years ago. As then, and with every policy adjustment along the way, I have always abided by and respected your rules. If I ever took an additional shift drink, it was only after I asked for and received your permission. I don’t think I ever took a second Staff [meal] for the week; but I know that, if I had, I would have asked. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
When an employee who was covering another’s shift came in one hour early, yet still managed to find work to keep busy, you fired him on the spot, so I’m told. Only after others protested did you reconsider, and ultimately rehire him. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
You’ve instructed a hostess to lie to a tow truck driver, by telling him that an illegally parked car belonged, not to a friend of yours who was with you on a boat, but to someone who had been rushed to the hospital in diabetic shock. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
I could go on for pages about the nearly endless ways in which [The Company] is inefficient, disorganized, and poorly managed. I could offer suggestions and ideas for improvement – if not outright solutions – to [The Company]’s various woes. Many others could, too. These problems aren’t all your fault, by any means. Many, by my judgment, go much higher than you in the company’s hierarchy. But that’s not the reason for why I quit.
In March, a friend of mine asked me if she could come in and feed herself and her children at your restaurant, using my Staff[meal] for the week. I had always been under the impression that I could give my Staff [meal] of the week to anyone I wanted. This made sense to me, I thought, because whenever an employee’s friend sat down to a “free” [meal], they also bought drinks from you, additional [meal](s) from you, salads from you, and desserts from you. These things all give you profit, (which I do feel is the one thing you seem pretty consistent about valuing.) So, back in March, when my friend asked me if she could use my Staff [meal], I said yes, knowing that I hadn’t used it myself that week. The friend in question was [my friend], a former [Company] employee who had left the company on good terms and had, to the best of anybody’s knowledge, been on “good terms” with you and the restaurant. Yet, when she came in, you really didn’t want her to get that free flatbread. She ordered beers, salads, a second [meal]… but that wasn’t enough. That free-loading, advantage-taking, single-mother-of-two had some nerve to expect the Staff [meal] that I had promised her. First, you questioned whether I had already used my Staff [meal] on a particular day that week. I demonstrated to you that I had not; not on that day, and not on any other day of the week. With your first means to deny her gone, you made up a new rule on the spot: “No More Staffers For [my friend], Ever.”
I nearly walked out at that moment. But, I pride myself on my thoughtful nature. I quickly rationalized for myself that with the current job market as it is, I would benefit greatly from seeking out another job first. More importantly, I stayed so as to not make the rest of the very busy Friday night any more difficult for my coworkers. I counted up the money I had on hand, $14 – nearly enough to pay for a [basic, low cost meal] - and I gave [my friend] the money. [X], this is your restaurant, and I will fully allow that you get to make the rules, but I’ll be damned if I am going to go back on my word if I don’t have to. That’s not how I do business. I told her she would get one of those [meal]s compensated, and despite your own efforts, I made it happen, to the best of my abilities at the time, by emptying my own already meager wallet.
So for over three years now I have ignored all these examples of how I don’t like the way you do business. Each time, whether they happen to me, or to someone else – each time, I have ignored them, and continued to work for you. That’s why people stay for so long at [The Company]; each instance by itself is more easily ignored, easier to brush off. But, when measured cumulatively, I feel that a very different picture of you emerges.
Your simultaneous disrespecting of [my friend], and me, was my tipping point. I sincerely hope you can learn to be better for your employees, now, and in the future, than you were for me. Many of them are close friends of mine, and I know they deserve it, whether or not you give it to them. But, if you feel I am wrong, and your behavior has always been respectful, professional, selfless, and responsible, then I expect you will suffer many more “tipping points” in the future. And for however that inconveniences you, you will deserve it.
Since that night in March, I have been taking my time, seeking another job that I can be happy with; a job that can give me some worthwhile experiences; a job that is worth my time spent. Now that I’ve found one, now you know why: I don’t like the way you do business. I quit.
P.S. – I expect this is not a happy letter for you to read. You are welcome to respond to me directly, but allow me to suggest a more constructive approach: I’m done with [The Company], done with you; I’m not worth it. At best I’m a lost cause, and I don’t need apologies, defenses, or retorts. If you feel a need to respond, please address the people who still work for you. They are the ones who still deserve better.
Why I think you should consider taking it down: I think it is important for Bxxxx to hear these things and be able to consider them, and now he has that opportunity. I think it is important for others to hear these things too, and now they have. But, especially with having the internet involved, this seems like there is the assumption being made – the assumption that Bxxxx is the “bad guy.” Not all assumptions are wrong, but there is that old saying about you being an ass. My point is, upon reflecting, I think it might have been better to give these words to Bxxxx alone, maybe Fxxxxxxxx too (still undecided on this myself) but not to the world. This would have given Bxxxx the chance to be the “bad guy” or not – ignore your words or not. Given fair warning, showing these words to the rest of the world makes more sense, if we can all agree that Bxxxx is refusing to make any changes.
It’s obviously a little late for that, but maybe not too late to take it off the internet. Or perhaps, remove it from facebook and consider removing his name from the post on your blog. Because now we all know, and he knows we all know. Just a thought – I don’t know how much it would affect things one way or another.
I’ve been thinking about this too. Not that anything can be taken back, but that damage has been done, and the necessary points have been made. I think I will do this relatively soon.
to the face! i am so let down in the way you have put out your differences. if you have problem tell the person or let it go! we are family or did you forget.
To clarify for anyone reading this, “we are family” – that was a metaphorical family being referenced.
In response – I knew this would not make me any new friends, and I regret the loss, to a degree. But when a “family” member treats some of his members in the ways described above, is loyalty really the preferable response?
You have no decency…. talking about family?!? YOU have NO respect for family!! And talking about to the face… how dare you speak!
I started writing a response, but I think you are misinterpreting the preceding comment, and largely having anger at me because of that. the “family” referenced previously was metaphorical… a “family” of restaurant employees, none of who are purposefully related (though there are a few coincidental relations). Dulce’s comment, from which I suspect your note stems, was valid as to the close-kniw nature of the people whom work there. I used to be one of them, and as you can probably tell in the letter, have chosen to burn that bridge. Mr. X is not actually my Uncle or father or anything, he’s just a former boss whose behavior I don’t approve of. If I am wrong, I apologize, and can address you more fully in a different response.
I’m sorry for the confusion. My comment was not a well thought out one and was aimed at the homewrecker who commented above. I was enraged by her apparent sense of decency talking about the sanctity of family and how you should share things to the face. Apparently she has forgotten her role in this debacle… Or at least she can point fingers while overlooking her wrongdoings.
Completely understood. though my confusion was for other reasons, I was not, and remain, unoffended.
Jimmy, that’s not the [Company] way.
never forget…..food is love.
we all have five faces.
jus’ kiddin.
your points are valid, but Mr. X is suffering through failure as husband, father, boss, man, etc. better to pull the punches, now.
just curious, can you look back on your time there and honestly say you did nothing to generally undermine him, or set him up to fail? i ask because i would say that i did while i was there, mostly without knowing the damage i was doing throughout that time. it’s easy to pick apart the top brass, but this failure is ultimately yours [or mine] for not offering help to Mr. X or whoever and bravely confronting the real issues. two things i think about my time with the company, now that i have had years away (i was gone long before you started), are these:
1. you never know what goes on behind closed doors
2. the choice to be treated that way was yours (as well as the choice to not be treated that way).
water under the bridge, anyway
Thanks, Anon, you make some good points. It is exactly because I don’t know what goes on behind closed doors that I am forced to accept the face value of a situation. maybe that’s innappropriate, or short-sighted, but without the transparency, being left with what I can see, so shall I judge. I don’t feel there’s much room for his level of unprofessionalism, at his position. If his life sucks, and he can’t handle it, he needs to get himself out of there, temporarily at least, and take care of himself instead of drowning his troubles and then taking it out on others. You’re absolutely right, it was my choice to be treated that way, and especially for so long – what can I say? There are a lot of reasons to stick around, and as I mentioned in my letter [X]‘s behavior on a case by case basis is fairly well ignorable, there’s no doubt about it. I won’t ever claim perfection as an employee. but unless we want to get into the nitty gritty of what defines undermining behavior, in general, I will say, confidently, that no, I didn’t do anything that set him up for failure. I gave my all, 99.9% of the time, I excelled verywhere, adn when I started, I got good quickly. these aren’t bragging rights – the job is fairly easy. Like I said, I’m not a saint, and certainly my coworkers knew what I thought of him through general grumbling (as did I from them) constantly over the years. but I don’t think that’s undermining.
How’s this for a thought? Is it any more my position to set him up for his success, than it is his for mine? there’s a lot of emphasis on “team” and “family” at [The Company]. does it not go both ways?
I caught some flack for disrespecting the [Company] “famiily,” with my letter. Well, I think he should get his fair share of that flack too, especially if I’m going to take it. If the metaphor is really going to stretch that way, this is one abusive father figure I want no part of.
Be well – If it interests you, you may want to read my follow-up response to this letter, if you haven’t already. Right here on this blog.
Further thoughts on whether I have ever (consciously or not) undermined [Mr. X] or [The Company]: As I was washing dishes and folding laundry this morning, mulling over that question, I felt one thing was left unsaid which I think is a valid point: Bringing up my own behavior is completely appropriate, considering how much I brought up [X]‘s behavior, and criticized it, and it’s one of the few responses I’ve gotten that actually take on the contents of my letter at all, which is also noteworthy. And as I’ve said, I submit myself to anyone’s judgment, whether for the style or substance of my letter, or my own behaviors while at [The Company]. But Beginning to judge me only further necessitates that [X] receive the same scrutiny, and, if they be, let the judgments be so critical and scathing of me also I don’t think I’ll appear so badly. Judging all involved is inarguably the most fair.
Sciirwine Having worked with you for 3 years and also being a former employee. Kudos to you for making the step in which many times I contemplated.the company used to mean a lot to me–looking up to many employees and was proud to work there. Unfortunately, now that certain circumstances have come to light I cannot say I feel the same. In fact I feel foolish and naive. I feel that mr. X was more often times passive aggressive, an ineffective communicator, rude, and downright cowardly. I’m sure you have been given grief by others and probably mr. X’s “possy” of enablers who find it trendy to drink to excess, smoke pot, neglect their loves ones, relive their teenage years and not take any responsibility for their actions. I feel most sad for the family members who are taking the brunt of all this careless behavior. [the company] was supposed to mean more– it was supposed to be safe- now I just find it trashy. To mr. X– wake up! Get help and hope to god you will be forgiven because your reputation is a scar that may fade but unfortunately will never go away. To sciirwine– you are missed by someone who thinks highly of you.
Thanks very much for your thoughts and well wishes, anon. I edited one word of your comment because it gave away the name of the company – not that anyone who knows is fooled, but at this point, since I’ve chosen to go this route, I figure I might as well go all the way.
I don’t think anything you said was worth me disagreeing with, but I would like to point out for the sake of my own ethical clarity, lest anyone want to view me as hypocritical. Drinking alcohol, smoking pot, and the use, even, of other “illicit,” “frowned upon” drugs, especially in moderation, or even in excess, but still responsibly overall (being responsible to one’s actions when inebriated, etc.), is nothing I frown upon or would claim innocence of. What made [X[‘s behavior so worthy of complaint in that sense of the letter was the blatant irresponsibility that accompanied such drug abuse. Therein lies a major part of the overall problem which I see.
Again, thank you.
I agree. I did not mean to judge alcohol and pot. Merely that it was used irresponsibly and in the wrong setting– “while on the clock”. I just found that if mr. X wanted employees to follow rules he should too– simply put lead by example.